Natural-Knee® II Unicompartmental Knee System
|
The Natural-Knee II Unicompartmental System was designed to achieve
optimal fixation and even load distribution. Its philosophy is
consistent with the rest of the Natural-Knee II Family, designed to be
bone conserving, and provide excellent anatomic realignment, all
achieved with state-of-the-art instrumentation. The Natural-Knee II Unicompartmental implants are universally designed, allowing interchangeability medial to lateral and left to right. The slightly rounded femur and tibial insert geometries create a moderately congruent design. Both porous ( CSTi™ porous coating) and nonporous (grit-blasted) coatings are available. |
|
Unicompartmental – A Proven Concept
Because of the high level of patient satisfaction, UKA has become an attractive alternative for patients with Unicompartmental, noninflammatory arthritis. Recent reports have shown comparable durability and clinical results between UKA and TKA.¹
Surgeon-friendly MIS™ Instrumentation
The MIS instrumentation for the Natural-Knee II Unicompartmental System provides a step-by-step surgical technique with measured and captured resections that avoids the obstacles of some Unicompartmental knee instrumentation systems.
MIS Advantages/Disadvantages
The MIS instruments enable the implantation of Natural-Knee II Unicompartmental implants through a 3-inch incision. The MIS technique avoids patella eversion and reduces disruption of soft tissue and quadriceps. Some of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery are:
- Earlier mobilization
- Less pain
- Reduced length of hospital stay
- Smaller incision
- Less blood loss
However, MIS techniques also have a longer operating time.
References
- Engh, Gerard. Can We Justify Unicondylar Arthroplasty as a Temporizing Procedure? In the Affirmative. The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 17 No. 4, Supply 1; 2002.